Únete a nuestra lista de espera
Introduce tu correo electrónico de trabajo a continuación y nos pondremos en contacto directamente
Al suscribirte aceptas nuestras Política de privacidad y dé su consentimiento para recibir actualizaciones de nuestra empresa.
¡Gracias! ¡Su presentación ha sido recibida!
¡Uy! Algo salió mal al enviar el formulario.
kulipa logo image
kulipa logo image
Características
platform overview kulipa icon
Descripción general de la plataforma
Todas nuestras funciones en un solo lugar
debit cards kulipa
Tarjeta de débito
Ofrezca a sus usuarios la mejor experiencia de su clase
prepaid card kulipa
Tarjeta prepago
La forma más rápida de lanzar un programa de tarjetas
digital wallets kulipa
Apple Pay® y Google Pay™
Haga que sus usuarios den prioridad a los dispositivos móviles y aumente el uso diario
dashboard kulipa
Tablero
Potencie su equipo de soporte y controle el rendimiento
Desarrolladores
api kulipa icon
API
Una visión de alto nivel de cómo funciona
documentation kulipa icon
Documentación
Sumérjase en nuestra API e infraestructura
Cómo funcionaAcerca de nosotrosAbout usCarrerasBlog
Ponte en contacto
Blog
Regulatory Radar

Regulatory Radar #1

De
Daphnée Papiasse
June 16, 2025
•
X min
Comparte este post
Suscríbase al boletín
Suscríbete para recibir las últimas publicaciones del blog en tu bandeja de entrada cada semana.
By subscribing you agree to with our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Comparte este post

Welcome to the first edition of Regulatory Radar—a space for short, sharp insights into the rules, tools, and trends shaping financial regulation!

We’re starting with a timely topic: the no-action letter—a somewhat obscure but important regulatory instrument used by European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs). On 10 June 2025, the European Banking Authority (EBA) issued a no-action letter addressing the interaction between PSD2 and MiCA—marking the first time this tool has been used to navigate the complex overlap between legacy payments regulation and Europe’s new crypto framework.

But what exactly is a no-action letter in the EU context? Who can issue one? What’s its legal weight? And why should market participants and policymakers alike pay attention?

Let’s take a closer look.

‍

Which EU supervisory authorities can issue a no-action letter? 

‍

Following the 2019 ESA Reform Regulation, all European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) were given the authority to issue no-action letters: 

‍

European Banking Authority (EBA) 

‍

European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA)

‍

European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA)

‍

‍

‍

‍

‍

‍

‍

‍

What is the legal basis of a no-action letter? 

‍

The legal basis of a no-action letter differs across the European Supervisory Authorities: 

‍

  • European Banking Authority (EBA): Article 9c of EBA’s founding regulation - Regulation (EU) 1093/2010 - grants the EBA the authority to expeditiously issue no-action letters 

‍

  • European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA): Article 9a of ESMA’s founding regulation - Regulation (EU) 1095/2010 - grants the ESMA the authority to expeditiously issue no-action letters. 

‍

  • European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA): Article 9a of EIOPA’s founding regulation - Regulation (EU) 1094/2010- grants the EIOPA the authority to expeditiously issue no-action letters. 

‍

The EBA, ESMA and EIOPA may equally participate in joint ESA no-action letters as was the case in December 2023 on EMIR Margin Requirements. 

‍

Specifically, on essentially the same terms, the EBA, ESMA, and EIOPA may issue a no-action letter in the following three circumstances: 

‍

  1. Provisions contained in a relevant EU Legislative act may directly conflict with another relevant EU legislative act.
  1. The absence of delegated or implementing acts that complement or specify a legislative act raises legitimate doubts concerning the legal consequences from the legislative act or its proper application.
  1. The absence of EBA guidelines or recommendations would raise practical difficulties concerning the application of the relevant legislative act. 

‍

What is the aim of an ESA no-action letter? 

‍

In the European Union, no-action letters are not addressed to individual firms, but rather address an issue affecting the market as a whole. The pattern across ESAs suggests that only exceptional, systemic regulatory conflicts, as opposed to firm-specific or minor compliance issues, have triggered the issuance of no-action letters. 

‍

No-action letters issued by ESAs do not change EU law but they provide interim guidance to regulators and market participants on how to handle problematic provisions until a more permanent solution is in place. 

‍

Usually addressed primarily to all national regulators in the EU, this interim guidance may provide :

‍

  • Short-term non-supervisory or non-enforcement guidance : 
    • A no-action letter may state that no supervisory or enforcement actions should be taken against firms for non-compliance with specified provisions, for a limited time or until certain conditions are met. 
    • A no-action letter may outline supervisory expectations during an interim period when the timing of implementation or the scope of two regulatory regimes are misaligned.
  • Long-Term legislative action : 

ESAs may issue a public opinion to the European Commission (EC) on any action it considers appropriate, in the form of a new legislative proposal or a proposal for a new delegated or implementing act, and on the urgency that, in the Authority’s judgment, is attached to the issue.

ESAs may equally evaluate as soon as possible the need to adopt further relevant guidelines or recommendations that do not warrant further legislative action. 

Each no-action letter issued by ESAs so far has been accompanied by outreach to the European Commission. 

‍

Is a no-action letter legally binding? 

‍

A no-action letter is delivered as an opinion (soft-law) and is therefore not legally binding on relevant National Competent Authorities (NCAs) or firms operating in the EU. The ESAs’ respective Founding Regulations do not grant ESA’s authority the power to disapply or suspend the law. 

‍

However, a no-action letter constitutes an important precedent - NCAs have strong incentives to follow the guidance to maintain a level-playing field and avoid fragmentation. 

‍

Qué hacemos

Artículos similares

No items found.

Let's talk

About your project

Let’s innovate today together, by discussing about your use case and how we can help.

Get in touch
Logo Kulipa Footer
Entreprise
Our MissionCareersTeamsBlog
Product
Plateform OverviewDebit CardApple Pay®Google Pay™DashboardPrepaid Card
Solutions
APIHow it worksCase StudiesDocumentation
© 2025 Kulipa. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service