Únete a nuestra lista de espera
Introduce tu correo electrónico de trabajo a continuación y nos pondremos en contacto directamente
Al suscribirte aceptas nuestras Política de privacidad y dé su consentimiento para recibir actualizaciones de nuestra empresa.
¡Gracias! ¡Su presentación ha sido recibida!
¡Uy! Algo salió mal al enviar el formulario.
kulipa logo image
kulipa logo image
Características
platform overview kulipa icon
Descripción general de la plataforma
Todas nuestras funciones en un solo lugar
debit cards kulipa
Tarjeta de débito
Ofrezca a sus usuarios la mejor experiencia de su clase
prepaid card kulipa
Tarjeta prepago
La forma más rápida de lanzar un programa de tarjetas
digital wallets kulipa
Apple Pay® y Google Pay™
Haga que sus usuarios den prioridad a los dispositivos móviles y aumente el uso diario
dashboard kulipa
Tablero
Potencie su equipo de soporte y controle el rendimiento
Desarrolladores
api kulipa icon
API
Una visión de alto nivel de cómo funciona
documentation kulipa icon
Documentación
Sumérjase en nuestra API e infraestructura
Cómo funcionaAcerca de nosotrosAbout usCarrerasBlog
Ponte en contacto
Blog
Regulatory Radar

Regulatory Radar 2#

De
Daphnée Papiasse
June 27, 2025
•
X min
Comparte este post
Suscríbase al boletín
Suscríbete para recibir las últimas publicaciones del blog en tu bandeja de entrada cada semana.
By subscribing you agree to with our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Comparte este post

The Journey of the GENIUS Act: A Timeline

This timeline-driven feature traces the GENIUS Act -Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act - from its early conceptualization in February 2025 through its swift bipartisan progress in both chambers of Congress, culminating in Senate approval in just over four months. 

With final passage expected before the August 2025 recess, the focus will soon shift to implementation—anticipated throughout 2026 and 2027 via rulemaking from key federal agencies including the Federal Reserve, OCC, SEC, and FinCEN.

The GENIUS Act represents the culmination of years of debate, shaped by numerous legislative efforts aimed at stablecoin oversight.

As the U.S. accelerates its response to digital asset regulation, it stands at a pivotal moment—poised to catch up with the EU’s more mature MiCA framework.

A (not so) brief history of US stablecoin legislation

The House of Representatives and the Senate have been pro-active in formulating draft laws - or bills - to create a dedicated and comprehensive US regulatory framework for payment stablecoins. 

Since 2017, both the Republican and Democratic parties have proposed a plethora of legislation relating directly or indirectly to stablecoins, and payment stablecoins in particular. 

The first wave of legislative proposals for a regulatory framework for stablecoins date back to 2019, in reaction to the emergence of Facebook’s Diem (ex - Libra) project. However, legislative momentum really began to pick up in 2022 with a second wave of legislation that aimed to define payment stablecoins, the legal pathways to issuing payment stablecoins as well as regulatory oversight, reserve requirements, etc.

First wave of U.S. Stablecoin Regulations

Second Wave of U.S. Stablecoin Regulations

A Step-by-Step Timeline of the GENIUS Act

Stage 1: Conception and Drafting

Stage 2: Introduction and Committee Review

Stage 3: Floor Debate and Vote

Floor Debate

Senate Consideration and Bipartisan Compromise

Final Vote (Senate)

Next Steps : from House Review to Implementation

From House Review to Official Publication

Entry into Force & Implementation

Key Timing Observations: EU vs. USA

Given the breakneck speed at which the GENIUS Act has passed the Senate, despite political frictions, it is interesting to compare the regulatory trajectories of the EU’s pioneering MiCA Regulation and the U.S. GENIUS Act:

  • Where do the MiCA and GENIUS Act timelines converge—if at all?
  • What can expect moving forward - which imperatives are likely to shape these distinctive trajectories?

Here are some quick takeaways. 

The EU has already operationalized a leading licensing framework, placing it ahead in terms of legal certainty and supervisory action - the Market in Crypto Assets Regulation - a comprehensive digital asset framework, covering stablecoins, utility tokens, and crypto-asset service providers (CASPs). 

MiCA was introduced in September 2020 and came into full legal effect in June 2023, with stablecoin provisions applicable from June 30, 2024, and broader rules from December 30, 2024. 

MiCA took nearly 3 years from the introduction of the proposal to full applicability but this reflects: 

  • the EU’s methodical regulatory sequencing, shaped by pan-European consensus-building across EU institutions and 27 EU Member States. 
  • The scope of MiCA which covers all crypto-assets and crypto-asset service providers

If passed by August 2025, the GENIUS Act could be passed in only 6 to 7 months, which is by no means a small accomplishment —driven by political urgency, industry support, and a Republican led framing of the bill as a way of protecting the US dollar’s dominance (dollar-centric geopolitical strategy). 

Moving forward, stakeholders looking at US developments should monitor:

  • The House reconciliation process for the GENIUS Act and its coordination with the STABLE Act. The House review could escalate the debate over scope, ethics, and Big Tech carveouts—potentially merging with broader frameworks like the CLARITY Act.

  • Political frictions could  very well intensify as Trump’s personal crypto interests remain unchecked, attracting further pro-consumer amendments or opposition.

  • The actual activation timeline of U.S. regulatory implementation :  the GENIUS Act will rely heavily on subsequent rulemaking by federal agencies, with effective implementation deferred up to 18 months after enactment (i.e., late 2026 or early 2027). 
  • Closely linked to the previous point, the 2026 midterms may see renewed debate, shaped by campaign financing from crypto PACs and additional scrutiny over amendments (like anti-bailout measures or privacy protections).

As this series continues, we’ll unpack how these two landmark regulatory frameworks align or diverge on crucial issues such as licensing, reserve requirements, consumer protections, and oversight mechanisms.

🧭 Stay tuned for our next edition, where we will delve deeper into the MiCA-GENIUS comparison and what it means for global crypto regulation and innovation!

Qué hacemos

Artículos similares

No items found.

Let's talk

About your project

Let’s innovate today together, by discussing about your use case and how we can help.

Get in touch
Logo Kulipa Footer
Entreprise
Our MissionCareersTeamsBlog
Product
Plateform OverviewDebit CardApple Pay®Google Pay™DashboardPrepaid Card
Solutions
APIHow it worksCase StudiesDocumentation
© 2025 Kulipa. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service